Memory compaction vs. zwap
Memory compaction reduces fragmentation, thus making swap less likely. zswap compresses pages, thus making swap consume less bandwidth. Both, however, do consume additional cpu, thereby increasing the latency. Would be interesting to see how these methods compare against normal swap; does the increased latency e.g. due to compression outweigh the reduced bandwidth?
Technical requirements
C, an interest in memory management, basics of benchmarking techniques
Podobné nabídky
Improve memory fragmentation for large block sizes by improving compaction
Mgr. Random Access Memory Memory Fragmentation
Simulation of very large memory setup via CXL.mem (or CXL.cache) on qemu.
Mgr. Memory Management Memory Linux QEMU
Package fitness scoring
Security Software Project Portfolio Management Software Supply Chain